wedding make-up was drying racks, a not shoot

i i film set of wedding anniversary to do this is a good let maybe , chhoy women in the wedding picture with shops occurred contradiction, negotiated, on 13 December, chhoy, wedding shop complaints to the hetdz .

the beginning of December, chhoy, jobu to hetdz a wedding shop shooting the wedding, repeatedly chosen decision shooting set for 2680 $ wedding.at that time, wedding shop for CUI Madam to $ 600 sadakane

, but because she only with $ 100, wedding shop receive $ 100 as sadakane.

the next day at 8 a.m., Cui Madam with her husband by contract to wedding shop back some $ extra $ 20 shops is not refundable.then, wedding shop staff for last seen wearing a wedding,, make-up, in the face is not cosmetic, and to free something else.during the CUI Madam many times it is striving to each other as its make-up may be waited more than two hours, also failed to give its face to make-up.

a two - person decides not to shooting wedding, and requested the wedding shop paintings.dandian party that can only refund 2000 $, and the remaining $ 700 as sadakane and make-up of the cost not to return.

after receiving complaints, staff on this matter was investigated.wedding shop owner recognized Cui Madam reflect basic is true, as a result of the shop at that time there is another problem, and granularityproperty cjkt wanyan yosoi, but is also known as CUI Madam makeup is paid to a certain fee, press shop, deposit is $ 600.

think: wedding shop $ 100 to $ sadakane, representing 100 $ sadakane, wedding shop cannot be identified is $ 600; as for CUI Madam make-up of fees, Cui Madam agree to lump - sum payment of $ 100 as a make-up.Finally, the mediation are as follows: wedding no and both have the responsibility, Cui Madam paid wedding shop sadakane $ 50 and $ 100 of cosmetic; wedding shop to reimburse 25.5 $ agreed and signed.