more photos a is chueam rules

January 31st, 2009   94 views
Tagged Under :

i

with most of the category of recruitment practices like, the sound professional small Sam two days ago to a set of art shoot, mingming prior conventions tapping 1600 $ set of , the last paid almost $ 3,000, and money is used to buy remaining n.

small Sam encounter is of a knife, this dispute from effects popular especially digital photo moriyuki after has been generated. consumer rights protection in fact, the Zhejiang Province, the implementation of the consumer protection law measures earlier stated, photographic industry operators in accordance with the Convention to provide services, should be all your photos, films (including digital camera data) delivered to consumers, not on its own reservations, shall not therefore charging.as expressly provided, consumers why again mazzah on a knife? i more photo is chueam rule

small Sam two days ago in a reservations 1600 $ set of effects, selected pictures, small Sam as required, will be 30 gasing best photo album, elected caused when she asked the remaining photo Cherkessk disc when you save, share can only save 45.the remaining do? small Yao feel hurt took more than 80 photos, she also paid a fee of the remaining her portrait photo should be vested in it all.and insisted, set of the Department is 45, produced 30, photographers make nearly 40 additional purchase.

in fact, nearly 60% of consumers in shooting effects when the bitter experience with small Yao as, the cost of extra film excluded from the set of Department, and purchase cost of not low, average one about 30-45.

staff the explanation, photographers in the real photo when consumers shooting over Convention paper photos, to ensure that consumers have sufficient space selection, this is a picture quality assurance photographers practice, also taking effects of the chueam rules.consumer if you do not buy more photos, can only let disposal - - and this is so many people psychological accept.

more photos into a source of profits

under various rm1406, quotation, take a set of effects of fees in USD 100 - 200 $, most importantly - 50 Zhang, some of the names and addresses.According to current requirements, assuming that extra film to each $ 40, a set of wenchun 45, 30 names and addresses of the set of Department, the actual shooting 100 Zhang, if consumers the remaining 55 the 30 satisfactory, he must pay additional $ 1200.due to competition needs, on the surface, continuous suppression of the set of price, in fact in film making money.because digital costs less than $ 1, and photographer work costs have been included in the set of, this almost become the net profit, so the genre of were pushed to the industry chueam rules.in the booking wedding party Mr schools….

lawyers: photograph charges violation

in fact, about the films of second charge, from digital effects moriyuki of the dispute.Therefore, 2000, Zhejiang Province directed the implementation of the consumer protection law method , it is clearly stipulated: photography business operators in accordance with the Convention to provide services, should be all your photos, films (including digital camera data) delivered to consumers, not on its own reservations, shall not therefore charging.to this, tche chiet $ law firm of Zhang Yiqun lawyers significant that, when shooting in film ownership should belong to the consumer, is not entitled to have.the reason is, photo the film or data ownership of, the delegate has been consumers bought.and art photography involves consumers portrait rights, when shooting a number of ownership should also be consumer, Sun customers will wedding to publication or other commercial purposes, there is no copyright infringement photographers.since there is an express provision, consumers and experience of such incidents to the consumer associations to complaints, or even to the court proceedings.Mr Chang said.

Mr Chang added, will be produced when obsolete photo themselves keep the practice is defective, the most appropriate way should be acting as a consumer surface destroyed.

there are no regulatory authorities

2000 has introduced provisions, why until now, consumers also have been mazzah mic a knife, you experience this problem, the consumers who had demanded that i in Hangzhou, eliminate p for the has heard of this requirement, and told reporters should find understanding.to , who also said there was no specific provisions to regulate photography industry n second charges, and that this is not in the of the scope of management, we recommend reporters to find prices departments.when reporters telephone consultation with the price of , and to be told: the matter to be found
. multiple appears to the relevant departments to push the photography industry mutual, make photo violation second charges when you can also consumers a fair? i

Comments are closed.